Hi ! yeah I like the bottom one of #394 .. but it's not in the voting .. Nathan has a really hard job to do to do this ..
>From his screenshots I have to say .. although the design is simple and clean it does not fit as an icon .. I wonder if we should not do such photoshopped screenshots from all the designs that made it to the last round .. and I wonder why #394 has not been considered .. taking the facts from nathan I'd say #420 would give a nice Icon .. but it is not even rated .. :( Probably we all now know what the "User" would like .. But I would suggest to let the PSC go through ALL of the suggestions again considering the design of the User-voted .. and choose a cool one (but that would be probably after the contest).. winning does not necessarily mean that we HAVE to choose it or does it? kind regards Werner On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> My final concern is that we haven't seen a version of this logo >> without "Quantum" in it yet. > > > > Oh there are such too: > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/designers/1191094#entry-394 > > Best, > Anita > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
