So "Quantum" should NOT be part of the branding? I'm not saying either way - but one part of the debate I have not seen discussed (missed it?) is whether the brand we want to market is QGIS, Quantum GIS or both.
If we can decide on that aspect, deciding on the logo may be easier. Cheers Brent Wood --- On Sat, 5/18/13, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote: From: Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Final Logo Pick To: "Alessandro Pasotti" <[email protected]> Cc: "qgis-developer" <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 7:28 PM To me this is the look that I like [0] [1] [0] https://www.dropbox.com/s/okpdl3vvs9o25na/logo-nw-word.png [1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqshl3pxhdlz47d/logo-nw.png Following the git logo style. - Nathan On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Alessandro Pasotti <[email protected]> wrote: 2013/5/18 Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> +1 from me too. This has been the feedback I have had from users and hence the reason that I started that comp. Personally I like the cut out look that the new git logo has now http://git-scm.com/downloads/logos +1 I would like to see something in between the first and the last in #394, I mean, I like the look of the first #394 (and #50) but the lower right triangle of the Q should be more pronounced (but not as much as in the last #394). -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
