Already changed :) - Nathan
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ted <[email protected]> wrote: > Think the issue is dragged for no reason. We have a dev / master branch > splash screen that says 1.9 alpha while we debate on leaf ... > > its important to have a splash screen that's relevant. So, high time that > we change that. > > The debate can go on after that. > > My 2 cents > > > Ted > > > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Larry, >> >> Am 07.09.2013, 19:29 Uhr, schrieb Larry Shaffer <[email protected]>: >> >>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> next try: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.****com/u/42637169/qgis21_** >>>> 1generic.png<https://dl.**dropboxusercontent.com/u/** >>>> 42637169/qgis21_1generic.png<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42637169/qgis21_1generic.png> >>>> > >>>> >>>> now in green with "dev" instead of "2.1" :) >>>> >>> >>> I like the layout and color selection. Not sure I understand the leaf (?) >>> background, though QGIS is used quite a bit for forestry and >>> bio-sciences. >>> >> >> I just like the colors. It will only be used for a couple of days, and >> there are a lot of other things that still requrire attention before the >> Hackfest and FOSS4G, so I think I'll leave it. >> >> >> Just a thought: maybe instead try a bunch of translucent icons (new icons >>> for add layers?) floating/swirling around. I realize this is just an >>> interim splash, but could be something like that might make a good >>> graphic >>> for the web site as well. That really is one of QGIS strongest core >>> features: its ability to work with so many providers, both open and >>> proprietary. Plus those new layer icons look good. >>> >> >> Sorry, I don't think I can pull that off. >> >> >> If the new group photo is similar to the last two (a row or two of >>> faces), >>> then the use of both dev and master words in the layout means dev may >>> cover >>> some faces. 'Master' is really from git nomenclature, while dev is >>> probably >>> more commonly understood. So, I suggest just removing master and lowering >>> dev to make more room for the photo. Maybe try dev in the master's >>> yellow, >>> then. >>> >> >> Once we have some photos to chose from, I'm sure we'll find a way to make >> a decent splash. I'm not emotionally invested in either "master" or "dev" >> use. If we need the space, I'll happily get rid of "master". >> >> Best wishes, >> Anita >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Larry >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes, >>>> Anita >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 07.09.2013, 10:05 Uhr, schrieb Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Yes which is why I would rather not give the dev builds numbers apart >>>> from >>>> >>>>> a commit ID and how far pass the last git tag it was. >>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/****questions/3300746/deriving-**<http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/3300746/deriving-**> >>>>> application-build-version-****from-git-describe-how-to-get-*** >>>>> *a-relatively<http://**stackoverflow.com/questions/** >>>>> 3300746/deriving-application-**build-version-from-git-** >>>>> describe-how-to-get-a-**relatively<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3300746/deriving-application-build-version-from-git-describe-how-to-get-a-relatively> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Nathan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ramon Andiñach <[email protected] >>>>> >wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just for curiosity, did anyone have that problem with 1.9? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -ramon. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/09/2013, at 15:40 , Nathan Woodrow wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hey Anita, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I would just remove the 2.1 number as people might thing it's a >>>>>> released >>>>>> version. Maybe replace it with Dev >>>>>> > >>>>>> > - Nathan >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Hi Larry, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Here's a generic 2.1 splash >>>>>> > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.****com/u/42637169/qgis21_**** >>>>>> 0generic.png<https://dl.**dropboxusercontent.com/u/** >>>>>> 42637169/qgis21_0generic.png<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42637169/qgis21_0generic.png> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Best wishes, >>>>>> > Anita >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Am 06.09.2013, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb Larry Shaffer < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Anita, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Is it ok if we take a pic in Brighton? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > +1 from me. I think that's an excellent choice of photo. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > It could be something generic until then. If you want, I can whip >>>>>> > something up. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Right now, any users checking out the latest nightly are presented >>>>>> with a >>>>>> > splash that denotes 1.9 (assuming they have the splash turned on) >>>>>> instead >>>>>> > of 2.1. Not a big deal, but could confuse some users. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Maybe replace that with a new layout that will basically be the >>>>>> same as >>>>>> > when the Brighton photo is included? May be good to have the >>>>>> layout's >>>>>> style >>>>>> > be similar to the new stable version's splash, e.g. square corners >>>>>> and >>>>>> > choice of font; but, not too similar, so it is easy to see at a >>>>>> glance >>>>>> > which version you have launched. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Larry >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Best wishes >>>>>> > Anita >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Larry Shaffer < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> > > Hi, >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Does anyone have an idea for what the splash screen of the master >>>>>> branch >>>>>> > > builds should be? >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Regards, >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Larry >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>> > > Qgis-developer mailing list >>>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>>> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/****mailman/listinfo/qgis-****developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer> >>>>>> <http://lists.osgeo.**org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>> > Qgis-developer mailing list >>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/****mailman/listinfo/qgis-****developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer> >>>>>> <http://lists.osgeo.**org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>> > Qgis-developer mailing list >>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/****mailman/listinfo/qgis-****developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer> >>>>>> <http://lists.osgeo.**org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>> >>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/****mailman/listinfo/qgis-****developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer> >>>> <http://lists.osgeo.**org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >>>> > >>>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
