On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:35AM +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: >> On Mon, 30. Sep 2013 at 08:53:06 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> > Also, insisting in the production of binary makes the release process more >> > complex than it could be. Binary packaging and source releases should be >> > separate processes, IMHO. >> >> Any only else share the opinion that we should stop making packages and trust >> that others will pick up?
-1. I don't think that's a good idea. We've now seen that packaging is not trivial enough to be done by just anyone. It needs dedicated people and experience to produce working packages. > I'm not suggesting anyone to _stop_ doing something, only to allow > for releases to exist before they are binary packaged by anyone. I think this would cause a lot of confusions ... even more versions floating around. Which group of users would profit from this solution? Best wishes, Anita _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
