Hi Matthias. agreed. How to fund, this is the question. I have budget (at least at the moment). I haven't been able to spend it completly in 2.0 release sprint because all goes too fast for classical contract, where I'm constrained to pay for a specific work (debug or feature). Please be warned to public finances are not good in europe, and every unconsumed budget can be erased. Sponsoring should be a way to finance infrastructure consolidation, but in current rules, sponsoring can't be oriented.
I need help from the community to have a serious real use case unit test suite. I'm ready to fund a part if PSC gives an infrastructure and a manager. If no work canvas is given, I'm sure I won't have any successfull commercial proposal to such a funding. I also kindly ask other funders to systematically include unit test developpement for every new feature. Again today, I found 3 regressions, hard to find. I thought once 2.0 was out, I could spend less time testing, and more time working. It's still not the case. Again, you gave a lot unpaid work, when I was struggling to find a way to spend some.. Hope we'll find a way. Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-2-64bits-is-it-stable-tp5081507p5081586.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer