no, not yet, I found structural limitation looking for adding customized legends (aka items)... I waited Brighton to check if it was a problem related to my "ignorance" or a structural one.
I hadn't time to find what's the "procedure" to add a RFC in qgis with it's workflow (in mapserver is clear, I can learn the procedure reading ML) let me organize ideas and procedural proposal... or if it's more clear to you, please start it and I'll contribute as soon as I can... or, in the meantime, we can continue with this thread. Andreas, thank you to open this thread Luigi Pirelli (luigi.pire...@faunalia.it) On 9 October 2013 21:35, Andreas Neumann <a.neum...@carto.net> wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > Do you have a written proposal already? Is it available on Google Docs > so we can comment/append? > > Personally, I am also interested in enhancing group options in the layer > tree. Groups are not just stupid containers with only toggling of > visibility. They could also have a group opacity and blending and group > metadata. Later on we may also have clipping and masking on groups. So > we really should have an extensible mechanism for groups as new group > features appear. > > Yes, if we have a written proposal we will have more organization that > may help to fund this effort. > > Andreas > > Am 09.10.2013 18:19, schrieb Gino Pirelli: > > we did a little face to face meeting in Brighton with Martin D. and Marco > > H... QgsLegend classes need a refactory due to structural limitation. > > > > Marco H. did an estimation of the refactoring, but probably, as I can see > > there are more that need this refactoring, could be interesting collect > > features that this re-write should involve.... > > ....and obviously funding :) > > > > ciao Luigi Pirelli (luigi.pire...@faunalia.it) > > > > > > > > On 9 October 2013 09:35, Denis Rouzaud <denis.rouz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I heard some discussions... from Matthias, Martin and Nathan. > >> > >> but there are probably others! > >> > >> > >> On 10/09/2013 09:30 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > >> > >>> Am 09.10.2013 06:16, schrieb Bernhard Ströbl: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Am 09.10.2013 08:12, schrieb Denis Rouzaud: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I am not sure we should make any publicity to the legend API which is > >>>>> very bad. > >>>>> > >>>>> I hope these methods will deprecated soon ;) > >>>>> > >>>> So is there anyone working on fixing these legend API problems? > >>> > >>> We should probably come up with a Wiki page where we could collect > ideas > >>> what we would expect from a proper legend API. > >>> > >>> Andreas > >>> ______________________________**_________________ > >>> Qgis-developer mailing list > >>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer< > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > >>> > >> > >> ______________________________**_________________ > >> Qgis-developer mailing list > >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer< > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > >> > > > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer