I, my customers and without a doubt: Several thousands of ordinary users
of QGIS would simply _love_ the idea of having a stable branch which is
only updated with bugfixes. The problem with using QGS - "weekly" is
that you get the bugfixes, but also a lot of new - very untested -
technology. This gets the ordinary users stuck between a rock and a hard
place.
Regards
Bo Victor Thomsen
Aestas-GIS
Denmark
Den 21-02-2014 10:58, Sandro Santilli skrev:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:37:10PM +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
But to quote Tim: "We're not going anywhere". There will still be bugs in QGIS
2.3 to work on after the release. And I trust that you're not going to stop
bug fixing just because the fixes don't make it into 2.2.
How about encoding such trust in an official "2.2.x" branch to be used
as a "maintainance" branch from which to ship "2.2.1" after <n> days
of inactivity following last bugfix commit since previous release ?
I'm sure more bugs will be reported once 2.2.0 is officially out so
those <n> days of silence might take a few weeks too :)
--strk;
() ASCII ribbon campaign -- Keep it simple !
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/rants/ascii_mails.txt
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
