Happy to report that following Martin's last commit ( https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/daf1e0b6881cdb77df6f6a9dc988ad92e0f9019d), I cannot see any issues with vector/raster layer rendering, as well as labelling. All renders like 2.2, except the user experience is 10 times better :)
Larry, I'm pretty sure your labeling tests will mostly turn green now. Math On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dobias <wonder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Larry > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Larry Shaffer <lar...@dakotacarto.com> > wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > This is just awesome work! > > > > Unfortunately, all but the simplest labeling tests (default labels of mm > > unit) fail, especially any that utilize labels in map units. In your > > forthcoming detailed description of changes you mentioned, could you add > > some info on what may have changed with regards to output resolution? > > I am sorry about that, but I am sure we can sort it out in the next > few days. Mathieu has done a great job testing post-MTR rendering and > reporting regressions, just today he has added #9661 and #9662 - maybe > these are the issues causing the tests fail. > > The main change is that doing size/width calculations should get > simpler now, because the "scale factor" and "raster scale factor" are > now always equal to one (so we do not need to use them anymore) and > there is just one true DPI (instead of two DPIs - painter DPI and > scene DPI). I know that labeling had to do some voodoo to get the > rendering right, I remember updating that code, but maybe I missed > some pieces.... > > Regards > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
