On 03/24/2014 02:22 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Hi all. > After a short talk with Richard, I feel it is important to clean up the > unapproved plugin queue: we had about 40 plugins, some from 2012. > I'm writing the authors to ask for missing info, then I > approve/unapprove as I believe it is best for the project. > Of course I may be wrong, please forgive me: I think it is better to > approve a less than perfect plugin than leave dozens of potentially good > ones in the shade, and frustrate their authors and potential users. > Any suggestion and feedback welcome. >
Agreed, the point of approval isn't to vet the quality of the program - "experimental" is always welcome. I'd say anything with less than perfect information/quality just be flagged "experimental". I understood the intent of approval process was to prevent distribution of malicious code, spam and other nefarious purposes. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
