+1 with Nyall, Labeling solution is probably the right one Cordialement, Régis Haubourg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Régis Haubourg
Administrateur de données Géographiques Département des Systèmes d'Information (DCSI) Agence de l'eau Adour Garonne 90 rue du Férétra, CS 87801 31078 Toulouse Cedex4 Tél: 05 61 36 82 58 Mail: [email protected] Assistante Malika Cherif . Tel direct : 05 61 36 36 39 http://www.eau-adour-garonne.fr Accédez aux données sur l'eau : http://adour-garonne.eaufrance.fr/ > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Nyall Dawson [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mardi 25 mars 2014 22:34 > À : HAUBOURG > Cc : qgis-developer > Objet : Re: [Qgis-developer] Duplication of functionality: Data-defined size > and Size scale field > > > > > If we do that, we need to find a more readable interface interface for > > data defined properties. It is unclear to the user if some options are > > activated in there or not. A visual flag could do the trick, or a > > complete gui review, to avoid another subdialog. (hierarchical view is > > the current ergonomy option, and I like it). > > > > I think the ultimate solution would be to port the data defined gui control > which is used in the labelling settings over to symbology. > Larry's done a great job with this control and it's behaves very nicely - it's > much easier to set fields, copy expressions, temporarily deactivate > expressions, and see immediately if a setting is data defined. > > I'm hoping during 2.4 to make some composer item settings data definable, > and I plan on using this same control. It would be nice to add it to symbology > too so that there's consistency across the entire QGIS gui. > > Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
