It's really easy to move existing tickets. What I was looking for but didn't find yesterday was a way in a New Issue to assign it to a Sub-Project. If we do that it might be easier for tickets to end up in the right place to start.
Thanks, Alex On 03/26/2014 02:54 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote: > Category in main QGIS tracker should be removed and all tickets > moved into Processing subproject. > > 2014-03-26 11:46 GMT+02:00 Filipe Dias <[email protected]>: >> Great, thanks Alex. >> >> I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will >> probably open tickets in the main tracker with the general category >> Processing/Sextante and won't be able to specify which is the affected >> backend (the Processing bug tracker has a subcategory for each backend: SAGA >> GIS, GRASS GIS etc). >> >> A possible workaround would be to replace the category Processing/Sextante >> with Processing/SAGA GIS, Processing/R, Processing GRASS GIS etc. >> >> Thanks >> Regards >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Bruy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is >>> a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible >>> inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should >>> use Processing tracker. >>> >>> Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always >>> restore previous state. >>> >>> 2014-03-25 17:08 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy <[email protected]>: >>>> +1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if >>>> this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing >>>> bugs among QGIS ones >>>> >>>> 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel <[email protected]>: >>>>> As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket >>>>> system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal >>>>> categories. >>>>> >>>>> This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a >>>>> myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different >>>>> from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects >>>>> of >>>>> the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they >>>>> are >>>>> still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). >>>>> Hence >>>>> they each have their own category. The challenge here is >>>>> Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the >>>>> possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own >>>>> categories/sub-categories. >>>>> >>>>> Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and >>>>> then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not >>>>> right then we can talk about how to move tickets. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since >>>>>> GDAL >>>>>> tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that >>>>>> interests a >>>>>> lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main >>>>>> tracker. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> F. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two >>>>>>>> bugtrackers: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> active tickets -> http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets -> >>>>>>>> http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the >>>>>>>> plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, >>>>>>> QGIS-Processing >>>>>>>> GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this >>>>>>>> should be >>>>>>>> solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> F. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin >>>>>>> tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any >>>>>>> Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the >>>>>>> Plugin tracker. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a >>>>>>> sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't >>>>>>> showstoppers for release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
