Il 27/03/2014 12:33, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: > I would vote for dropping the plugin and just updating the processing > plugin. Having both ways is bad for us and bad for users, even worse > when some functions are missing from one but not in the other.
I understand well the point; however, the plugin has additional functions, e.g.: * a grass shell * a grass data browser * a grass digitizing environment. Whether these are important or not, it's a matter of users. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
