On 03/30/2014 04:13 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 27-03-14 09:33, Alex Mandel wrote: > >> Why not load balance 2 servers in different parts of the world? >> Bandwidth at OSUOSL is unlimited, hardware is already paid for (It's >> raid SAS drives, not cheap hardware). > > that is the plan now: building on the (much stronger/faster qgis2), > rsync to qgis server. > Perceived faster, the drives are actually slower (OSGeo has 15k rpm SAS drives in RAID6). RAM is non-ECC, CPU is probably faster (can't tell what the new machine has but osgeo machine are actually 8 core). Bandwidth from OSUOSL is likely Gigabit.
It's probably performance overhead from older ganeti, and limited cpu allocation to a particular VM. It may not actually be faster with the same load per allocated resource. Just minor points to keep in mind when trying to figure out the balance. Alex _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
