I already had a look at those script. The idea is very good, but the implementation is not ideal for an example.For instance, it uses message dialogs, something that should't be used Instead, exceptions should be raised and Processing will take care of that, and that will allow to use the algoritm correctly in the modeler.
So the answer is yes, but I would like to polish the code before adding t as an example that others might follow. 2014-05-12 7:57 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]>: > Hi. > Should we add this to Processing? > > http://ssrebelious.wordpress.com/2014/01/04/unifying-extent-and-resolution-of-rasters-using-processing-framework-in-qgis > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
