Hi Andreas, I'm doing it :) As you can see I've added the checkox options to have fine control on spatial relations. I could add the threashold value as well. I know we are in feature freeze, I'm doing it for the next 2.5/2.6. Should I wait for 2.4 release before submitting pull requests with new features?
giovanni 2014-06-05 8:41 GMT+02:00 Andreas Neumann <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Well, if someone works on improving the intersection functions it would > make sense to introduce a threshold value to allow to ignore area/area > intersections with very small overlaps (e.g. very small sliver polygons > overlapping). > > But I doubt that all of this would happen by itself without someone > investing time or money into it. Certainly not for QGIS 2.4 where we are > in feature freeze already. > > Andreas > > Am 04.06.2014 16:58, schrieb G. Allegri: > >> > >> Both options should exist. Perhaps a checkbox to exclude those that only > >> touch? > >> > > > > Admittedly, in my own version I have three checkboxes: > > > > - include layers that only touch > > - include layers that only overlaps > > - include layers the are completely contained > > > > and they are all checked by default (which is an intersects) > > This let me take full control on the intersection matrix. > > > > giovanni > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Alex > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri Twitter: https://twitter.com/_giohappy_ blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
