On 20 June 2014 15:02, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes. When I initially saw $feature and $numfeatures I thought - oh cool > - I can have access to the feature-record - although - as you said it > wasn't clear which feature this would be refering to. This naming is > really sub-optimal and hopefully we can still correct it. > > When was this introduced? In 2.4? If yes, there can hardly be any > content using this and I would propose to correct this today before we ship. >
It's been around a long time - since October 2012. I think we're stuck with it for the moment, unless anyone has any novel ways around this? Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
