Hi All, I agree with Denis and Nathan on the general idea, and also with Paolo on "don't change things on day before". From a user point of view, I can live 2.2 behaviour, since I already have seen what "release" meant for qgis project in 2.2. But, I think 2.6 should go to a more common definition of "release", ie package release. Do we have download stats of packages to clarify the minimum list of package to include in that release? To me , Windows, Ubuntu and MacOS should be the minimal list. Advanced users of other distros are much more accustomed with compiling process and are probably better understanding the difference between source code and package .
you're doing all great work, don't let the pressure rise ;-). Sorry for not having been able to support the final debug, release and translation process that time... Hope I'll find a way to do that in the future. Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Release-plans-tp5148090p5148188.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
