> I'm still convinced that this is mainly a packaging problem. but for which distribution? Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Redhat, SuSE, Windows, OSX? That's a lot of work for relatively few users on each platform.
I don't think that installing any other geoserver (Geoserver, UMN, ArcGIS) is much easier. Maybe the documentation and tutorials are better - but installation - is this really a problem? Everybody has different ideas how to organize files, configs, etc. Probably you wouldn't like my defaults and vice versa. But as I said - if someone wants to provide packages for a specific platform - he/she is welcome. Andreas > > It's rather common for other (debian-like) packages to provide default > apache working configs and to install dependencies (could be optional > too). > > It's just a (fast)CGI after all. > > Of course the deafult installation must be fine-tuned or tweaked for > production websites but this is also true for all other web > applications. > > _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
