Il 04/09/2014 13:24, Anita Graser ha scritto:
> Hi Matteo,
> Thanks for raising this issue! From my (user) perspective, I totally
> agree that QuickOSM is much more usable than the current core OSM
> functionality (which I cannot get to work properly at all). I cannot
> comment on the dev perspective too much though but it does not seem
> like the current OSM core plugin is the best technical solution
> either.

I also agree that the mainstream solution is not quite usable to me, and 
reducing
duplications is always good.
So, if there are no good technical reasons to avoid this, I'd prefer to have 
QuickOSM
in core, and current functions hidden or removed.
Thanks.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to