Hi Nathan, all, Le jeudi 25 septembre 2014 09:56:58, Nathan Woodrow a écrit : [..]
> IMO we could in the future use sqlite in memory datastore for the memory > provider which gives us a lot more options and range. Hugo is currently writing a QEP to exactly do that and as well address some issues regarding database features re-implementation. He should publish it for review sooner or later. This could help handle the memory layer topic, but actually is a wider issue. Vincent > > Changing the format of the project file to something that isn't xml is a > interesting idea however it's not something that should be rushed into > without consideration so I think that is a very different topic. > > - Nathan > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please excuse my ignorance, but > > > > Why would you want a memory (as in RAM) layer when you want permanent > > data? > > > > For portability reasons? > > That's fine, but then we should offer a possibility to support > > portability support for a real geo-format (with spatial index and all > > the goodies). To stuff it into the project file there can be support > > from a plugin, but I would not vote for adding this to core. > > > > To me it seems that the current demand for this comes mainly from wrong > > expectations created by the name (and people subsequently loosing data). > > And we can fix the name. > > For the portability issue, I'd rather go the longer way but get it right. > > > > Regards > > Matthias > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
