Il 19/10/2014 11:30, Andre Joost ha scritto: > The parameters are the same, so not really wrong. QGIS often does not > recognize > similar projections when the name does not fit. > > The only thing missing is the +wgs84 parameter from EPSG:23030: > > +proj=utm +zone=30 +ellps=intl +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs
exactly, in fact there is a shift due to that > > Those parameters are often ignored in shapefiles, and QGIS does not find the > right > EPSG code without them. do you know if there is a ticket about this? it is unclear to me where exactly the problem belongs: * the processing backend adding a (from QGIS point of view) malformed prj * Processing itself not copying the right prj to the output * QGIS failing to interpret valid parameters or? thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
