But we already have core implementation for this (I know, it is not merged and also require server-side app). Maybe we should compare this two ways and decide which one offers more functionality and will be more usable for large symbol collections.
If I'm not wrong, core functionality offers tags, groups and some other nice features. As reasult one can create complex search criteria. In other hand solution available in Processing is very simple (AFAIK it was developed as temporary solution until core functionality is not merged). Just my 2c. 2014-10-22 9:38 GMT+03:00 Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]>: > Il 21/10/2014 21:59, kimaidou ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> I think we could use the same feature as in processing for sharing scripts >> and >> models. It is based on a git repository, and works quite well. It would be >> sraitforward for devs to add icons, and users would be able to choose which >> icon set >> they want to download and then upgrade. > > Hi Michael, > sounds interesting, as it avoids entirely the complexity of a web-based > application, > and could be implemented soon, with minimal effort. This holds true for > symbols and > styles as well. > Any comment? Any taker? > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
