-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nyall,
Il 22/12/2014 23:47, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > I disagree - while there may be an issue with the difficulty of getting > wide testing of pull requests, the solution isn't to allow broken code > into master. You're right, we're big boys now, must behave. However: * the code is in good shape, not broken; works smoothly in a variety of situations * it opens a whole set of new and exciting applications, e.g. live tracking, drone monitoring, etc. * there are unsupported functions, as pointed out * if we remove it from master, it will soon become unmergeable, and will probably get lost; it happened several times in the past that what we left out of the door was never recovered. Overall, I still believe keeping it, but letting conscious users activate it when necessary, is a good compromise. In the meantime, we can start raising funds to complete the set of necessary features (I do not think it's a huge amount of work, once the money is found we have time to implement these for 2.8). All the best, and thanks for your thoughts. - -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSZFHcACgkQ/NedwLUzIr5FYwCcDkjcK175nE10t/u6yhE1hC1H XHUAn1pPEvfDIBMwdQYu+GpW9Pk3CbiD =cSp7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
