Denis, Jürgen, On Thursday, February 12, 2015 14:09:59 Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Denis, > > On Thu, 12. Feb 2015 at 14:04:31 +0100, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > > IIRC for the documentation, I think that the idea rose that LTR would be > > the only ones documented. > > Not sure. I guess that documentation is done for released stuff anyway, so > there's no need to update the documentation while development is still going > on. Agreed, documentation should be updated with each release of QGIS. This way we can add documentation for new feature for each new release but have a greater look to the next LTR to get the best documentation.
> > For translations, it would make sense to keep the application translatable > > during its whole life cycle, but I can't say. > > I think what we discussed was that transifex is used for master and the > release branches are maintained like they used to be before transifex (ie. > using linguist). Sounds good to me. Y. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
