> On 28 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de> wrote: > > Hi Sandro, > >> On Tue, 28. Apr 2015 at 11:44:15 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> Let's try hard to avoid backports unless very very important ? >> >> PS: I'd be in favor of reducing the silence requirement to 1 week, >> especially for the first few bugfix releases... > > If only our largest gap was large enough to cover a week. <snip> > > Just ~6.5 days... > > So that wouldn't have helped either. Maybe we should do monthly point release > with a week of no backports unless there were new bugs introduced. That would > still give a week window to test the release nightlies before there is a > release
If you'll excuse a user sticking an oar in... I've been wondering if there oughtn't be a fall back release trigger. For example, there must be a point release to at the same time as the next normal release. Which would at least guarantee a point release happened. (Probably want something a bit more frequent than that. Or perhaps a bit offset from the normal, so there aren't two things being tested at once.) Anyway, first LTR experiment, RM's call on how it happens. -ramon. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
