Hi Pavol On 05/26/2015 12:51 PM, Pavol Hnila wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > I could not find the 7a629ad commit. Yet I have tried the current > master and I admit that after your previous commit 536135a it actually > works fine for most purposes. > > The reopenings of every record of the dataset seems a minor issue for > the performance, since it only occurs when working with the Attribute > table. The performance is thus somewhat slower than it was by QGIS 1.8 > but it is still OK to work with. Zooming and paning does not lead to > the reopenings of every record of every table (it only leads to each > table being opened and closed separately). Tables that were not > selected from the dataset are rightfully ignored now (thanks to your > commit). > > I will rerun the tests on other platforms (I have tried only Windows), > yet I suppose that they will be identical and that we can live with this. > > Many thanks, > Pavol > > > On 22.05.2015 13:42, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: >> Hi Pavol, >> >> On Thu, 21. May 2015 at 12:37:49 +0200, Pavol Hnila wrote: >>> Is there a chance that someone corrects this particular code for >>> the next release? >> Check current master. The commit 7a629ad from Sandro Mani should >> cure the problem. I also should help with other performance >> problem introduced by the reopening of the OGR data source on each >> layer feature iteration. >> >> >> Jürgen >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer >> mailing list [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Can you try with 95a7408 which was done today? It is an improved version of the original fix which was reverted due to side-effects.
Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
