I found another issue with the new scaling method:

For multi level point symbols we need to be able to define the scaling on the symbol level. However, when adding it on the symbol level, the same rule applies both on the parent marker and on the individual symbol level.

What if one part of the symbol should be scaled differently than the other? We really need this to work on the indivual symbol levels, not on the parent marker - or at least make it optional that it scales the parent as well.

As it works currently, I get a very different rendering in the map, compared to the preview in the legend ;-(

Andreas

On 02.06.2015 15:53, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,

Thanks for explaining. The assistant is very nice and a welcome improvement! Thanks for investing and working on it.

I had an issue that I had a size defined in 2.8.x with "scaling by area" which, when opened in QGIS master displayed much bigger. Once I changed that in 2.8x to "scale by diameter" the symbol sizes are identical in master.

So there seems to be an issue with converting "scale by area" symbol sizes from 2.8 over to QGIS master.

Should I open a bug report or is one open already?

Thanks,
Andreas

On 01.06.2015 20:05, Régis Haubourg wrote:
Hi,
here are the ideas behind this work, Nyall (code reviewer) and Vincent
(author) could explain implentation choices more than me (funder):

- get a more consistent UI with data defined widgets, and not "advanced
fields". That way, size is in one place only.
- offer an assistant on size varying common expression. You will find it at
the bottom of the drop down widget. It computes max value from field or
expression and allows normal user to do what other GIS do.
- That assistant offer legend previsualisation, and generates a legend for
map and composer. I wish we have a legend for any expression...
- During implementation, we understood that symbol size was a multiplication
factor of size varying factor. That implied that it was impossible to
predict final screen size. The new implementation clears that up.
- offer a size varying graduated renderer, allowing the use of
classifications algorithms
- offer a legend for diagrams (yes!)

IMHO, we need to read previous versions correctly, but that sometimes need
to read all features to retroengineer a size expression. Vincent have
planned to polish that now that feature freeze is made.

All that needs testing of course. I'm not totally satisfied with the
assistant shortcut, hidden inside the size varying widget. If someone have a
better UI idea..

Hope that helps clarifying those changes.
Cheers
Régis





--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Data-defined-symbol-size-is-not-backwards-compatible-to-2-8-2-tp5208256p5208525.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to