Hi Martin
but is there a strong reason to deviate from
it?
Only a week reason ( clone() method ). But I think you are right and it
might be better to follow the ISO model to be more compatible with other
libs.
Regards,
Marco
On 23.06.2015 08:39, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi Marco
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Marco Hugentobler
<marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch> wrote:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-new-geometry-engine-td5208770.html#a5209162
Thanks - I thought this was already asked, but couldn't find where...
IMO the hierarchy in QGIS should follow the one in ISO and OGC models.
Maybe right now there is no practical advantage for the implementation
to follow the hierarchy, but is there a strong reason to deviate from
it? It seems confusing that multi-polygon cannot be cast to
multi-surface. I am afraid that things like this can bite us later...
Regards
Martin
--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
