This post is in no way a criticism of any of the QGIS team and their monumental efforts or their fabulous product. However, I thought someone should question how successful the four-monthly release schedule is. 2.8 immediately needed 2.8.1, and there seems to be the chance that 2.10 is immediately going to need 2.10.1.
Is the predestined release schedule meaning that the devs simply cannot test as much as they need? Alternatively, should the feature freeze be extended? Anyway, keep up the fabulous work, all of you. My organization has never looked back since migrating to QGIS, and it is only getting better and better. Thanks Tom -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Is-the-new-release-schedule-a-success-tp5213659.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
