Hi Richard,
Thank you for dealing with this very annoying issue. It is easy to ruin a good reputation, but not so easy to gain one. And it is especially annoying if such warnings to not provide enough meaningful information to fix such warnings. Andreas On 2015-08-07 10:26, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 06-08-15 22:45, Andreas Neumann wrote: > >> So Richard - could you try to follow the Webmaster Tools link and see if >> we can get more information? > > Did that. Does NOT give any information... > > It seems to have something to do with using httpS when visiting > https://www.qgis.org [1] > because visiting > https://qgis.org [2] is ok... > > My quess is/was that we had/have spam links in our wiki, but as said, > Google gives you the possibility to list the tainted url's... but that > list is emtpy :-( > > I've asked for a new 'review' now from Google. Which can take up 24 > hours they say... > >> The other thing to check is if the very recent certificate updates maybe >> trigger this warning? > > mmm, should not be the case, I think it is a coincident that Matthias > check/found this. > > But I even reverted the certificate now (you should see that it is still > valid until 18-10-15), but according to Google we are still tainted... > > Let's see what the which verdict is given by Google-UberMaster after > their review ... > > Regards, > > Richard Duivenvoorde > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer [3] Links: ------ [1] https://www.qgis.org [2] https://qgis.org [3] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
