On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:59:37AM +0000, m roy wrote: > > > Il 14/10/2015 08.20, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: > > Sure. Another option, if we feel there are no compelling reasons to > > have another LTR (I believe 2.11 have few additional function people > > can't really miss, and 2.8 seems generally quite well accepted), to > > skip next LTR and go straight away with the transition after 2.12 is out. > > Given that i love the QGIS project, and i do not mean to be rude at all: > > From a user perspective > > IMHO skipping the next LTR would be a huge mistake, people > find this statement on the QGIS web site: > > "Every third release (starting with 2.8) is a long-term-release (LTR) > that is maintained until the next long-term-release occurs." > > so accordingly a migration/project planning is done, and then out of the > blue there is no LTR (?)
+1 changing the plan right after making it isn't good. Shall a change happen, it should be advertised before the next LTR (following existing schedule) comes out. Personally I wouldn't care about missing 2.12, but 2.14 LTR is what I'm looking at (although it is always hard for me to figure out exactly when it is expected, I guess Feb 2016 ?). --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
