Il 21/10/2015 06:52, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto: > This alternate timeline proposal both speeds up the delivery of QGIS 3.0 > as well as insuring QGIS 2.14 LTR is shipped with a focus on stability > as devs can push new features onto QGIS 3.0. > > Thoughts?
Sounds reasonable. I think we should have an explicit strategy for plugins: in case an important (e.g. > 10.000 downloads?) plugin is not migrated by the original author, should we drop it, of upgrade it with a direct investment by the project? All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
