On 24 Oct 2015 21:51, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: > > Il 24/10/2015 12:47, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > > > No, that's not correct. Current thinking is 2.14 on schedule with only > > minor changes/bug fixes, then 3.0 with api break, etc & major new > > features 4 months later. > > > > So at most 8 months wait for a major intrusive feature. I think that's > > acceptable. > > I believe people who pays for a feature now expects it to be delivered > in 4 months, not 8. Perhaps we should ask them how they feel about this. > > What would then be the difference between 2.14 and a 2.12 LTR?
Non intrusive new features are allowed, just no major changes (eg labeling engine, expression contexts, geometry engine kinda stuff). We do have to keep SOME say in the release plans/schedule... I don't think we can satisfy everyone and even sponsors need to fit in with the bigger picture. I'm also sure there's a lot of commercial sponsors out there who would love the idea of a go-slow leading up to the next LTR and final 2.0 series release. Nyall > > All the best. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
