On 6 Nov 2015 06:16, "Hugo Mercier" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 05/11/2015 19:10, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > > > > > On 11/05/2015 05:07 PM, Hugo Mercier wrote: > > >> Correct. > >> A first step where the additional geometry columns are considered to be > >> expressed in the same CRS as the main geometry column would already be > >> interesting. > >> And yes, that would be better if additional geometries could be accessed > >> directly as QgsGeometry, and converted to WKT only when needed > >> (attribute table ?). It's probably only modifications provider-side. > > The conversion provider side are probably straightforward (just use the > > code that is used to create the main geometry of the feature).
I've got a partial implementation of this I tried a while back. I'll dig it up and see if it's of any use. Nyall > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
