Hello, I agree that manual removing is a better choice.
What if you moved the project file? You can choose to remove it from your "recent projects" or maybe change the path when double clicking on it, a windows dialog ask you to define the correct path, in the same way we can do it for layer. Y. On Thursday, November 12, 2015 13:16:14 Paulo van Breugel wrote: > Yes, I hadn't thought about projects on network, good point. Adding a cross > to easily remove them is a good idea. > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, DelazJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes it would be nice to be able to remove them when no more useful or just > > to hide them from people (as some stated) but don't make it automatic. > > Sometimes, you may open QGIS without having access to the network where > > projects are available. Having them cleared just because you didn't check > > access before would not be convenient. Rather grey them (and add a cross > > on > > each project for removal). > > > > 2015-11-12 13:07 GMT+01:00 Paulo van Breugel <[email protected]>: > >> As mentioned before I think the new opening screen with recent projects > >> is a great feature. However, an improvement would be to automatically > >> remove the projects that cannot be found (greyed out ones) as suggested > >> by > >> Stefan. Or the option to manually remove them from the list? > >> > >> Moving them to the bottom is another option, but what would be the reason > >> to keep them to start with? I could see a point if one can click on it > >> and > >> search for the new location, but as it is now, it only shows in the list. > >> > >> Paulo > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Blumentrath, Stefan < > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> R for example does save the “workspace” for a session on request, but I > >>> am not sure if this is so relevant for QGIS at all. Actually, IMHO much > >>> better to start an empty project by default than a (probably heavy) > >>> recent > >>> project one does not want to continue with. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Something that might improve the situation in a simple way (though I > >>> have no problems with the current situation) could be to mark (e.g. grey > >>> out) projects that were moved (cannot be found at the specified > >>> location) > >>> or those could be put to the end of the list or something like that… > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> Stefan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Qgis-developer mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Qgis-developer mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
