On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> I will assume from the lack of response from this email that most are > happy with the proposed workflow? > Thanks Nathan! Sounds good to me. Best wishes, Anita > > If not let me know soon or else I will continue with it as planned above. > > Regards, > Nathan > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> So I have been thinking about the QEP process, because yes the current >> process is not good and way to slow for how we work. To streamline I have >> talked to a few people and this is the notes so far. >> >> - Open for at least one week >> - QEP process should be fast and evolve into a PR but also not cut back >> on details. >> - PR can also be opened at the same time - however not recommend if >> something is still in planning stage and changing, or chance of rejection >> e.g don't update all the code headers with MIT and then open a QEP because >> it wouldn't happen. >> - Code based QEPs require at least 2 +1's >> - Requires +1 from maintainer of that area of code e.g Nyall for composer >> work, Martin for rendering thread >> - Project QEPs require majority PSC vote >> - May be extended upon request (eg, i'm on holidays but have feedback) >> - May be extended if required >> - Others can assign themselves as interested e.g I might be interested in >> Processing but can't comment on the code. Mainly just to provide feedback. >> - If no maintainer for a area of code, requires at least 2 +1s from core >> devs >> >> The tl;dr version: >> >> - Project QEP: PSC vote >> - Code QEP: min +2 (+1 from maintainer plus +1 from other) >> - Keep it semi formal but quick. >> >> The code maintainer for the different areas will need to be updated >> however I'm sure we can handle that. >> >> How does that sound to everyone? >> >> I would like to make it fast but also give us time to review changes that >> will affect the project. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
