+1 for the point release. And one release a month as scheduled seems reasonable to me. But since every user can not download and install each release, it'll be worth listing the bugs that are fixed. So the user can clearly evaluate if it's worth updating QGIS according to his needs.
2015-11-25 14:12 GMT+01:00 Anita Graser <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Il 25/11/2015 12:28, Werner Macho ha scritto: >> >> > According to my tests with Intersect and Union the ftools problem is >> > fixed now .. so this only "leaves" 2.10 without a fix - which we >> > apperently don't need (people using 2.10 should upgrade to 2.12 >> > anyway).. >> > >> > Well done! >> >> What a relief, thanks Marco, Werner, Juergen, and all! >> Probably we should advertise this, and suggest everybody to upgrade >> immediately. >> >> > +1 a big shout out for the new point release is definitely in order. > > Thanks for the fixes and I also think a point release schedule is helpful. > > Best wishes, > Anita > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
