On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:51:07PM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > > On 01/27/2016 04:34 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:04:20AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > >>> Anything not LIB_EXPORTed (or private) should be considered an > >>> implementation detail, > >> What about protected members ? > > For example: > > > > class CORE_EXPORT QgsFeatureRendererV2 > > > > protected static const unsigned char* _getPoint( > > QPointF& pt, QgsRenderContext& context, > > const unsigned char* wkb // <-- no boundary info ! > > );
> I'd not treat protected different from public, both are accessible for > external code. Ok. > If it's possible to keep the old API in place and have it deprecated, it > is preferable. I'm taking this path. --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
