Le mercredi 17 février 2016, 19:53:54 Richard Duivenvoorde a écrit : > On 17-02-16 19:42, DelazJ wrote: > > To have a complete list of issues for documentation (especially for > > needs_docs tag), does it mean that developers should amend their > > previous commits message (don't know if it's doable) so that a grep can > > retrieve these commits? Or do we consider that they are "lost" improveme > > Well, not sure if that is technically possible: it means changing the > commit message by adding a label AND writing some prose about the > addition. But dev's feel free to add the label if possible, or else: > sent an email to the documentation team describing what you fixed/added > to excisting features :-) > > Regards, > > R
Harrissou, Note that this is only true for 2.14 release as I copy pasted the commit message into each issue for 2.10 and 2.12. Batch script was up for 2.14. But if I remembered correctly, Otto did a check for 2.14. Y. -- Yves Jacolin _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
