Hi all I think we could have an option to allow keeping the joined fields, uncheck by default. This way the user will be able to choose.
Cheers Michaël 2016-04-11 15:57 GMT+02:00 roy roy <[email protected]>: > I think in general a tool should not overcome his own purpose, > why does joins exists? to maintain data in different tables i think. > > my 2c. roy > > Il 11/04/2016 11.46, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > and sorry for cross-posting. > > > > When cleaning Processing bug queue I found issue [0] about preserving > > joined fields in Procesing outputs. Before implementing this I want to > hear > > opinions, does it makes sense at all or better to leave things as is: > output > > layer contains only provider (non-joined, not virtual) fields from input > layer? > > > > Thanks > > > > [0] https://hub.qgis.org/issues/12893 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
