Hi Tom On 04/20/2016 12:16 PM, Tom Chadwin wrote: > I currently use a couple of random layers out there (one WFS, one WMS) for > Travis testing. One went wrong recently. What services does QGIS Travis > testing use? Presumably the devs have faith in those servers' and layers' > availability?
The problem with external services is that they need to be very stable. For this reason, the osm test is excluded on CI, it was producing many false alarms while never pointing to real issues. The best thing one can do is to bring up a server on localhost which responds (statically or with some simple logic) to the requests. See e.g. test_qgsnetworkcontentfetcher.py for how that can look. Matthias > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Public-WFS-and-WMS-for-CI-testing-tp5262050.html > Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Matthias Kuhn OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
