Thank you, Matthias! I will test it.
Andreas On 2016-06-16 09:35, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Sure, you are right, > > Sorry, the commit message was wrong but the code is ok. > > Matthias > > On 06/16/2016 09:28 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: Hi Matthias, > > Column header numbers? Aren't we discussing row header numbers? > > Andreas > > On 2016-06-16 09:25, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > Hi Andreas > > It took me less time than it took me to write this email > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/9f704d6e92b922555bddb3a5a648edaac2aedf34 > > Matthias > > On 06/16/2016 09:18 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: Hi Matthias, > > If there are no negative side effects - I'd like to see the same > behaviour like in spreadsheets - an always ascending list, starting from > 1 - regardless of the order of the rows. > > Would this be a lot of work to change this? > > Andreas > > On 2016-06-16 09:06, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > I always thought that they are the feature ID. But not even that, often > they are "feature id - 1", but that's not guaranteed at all. > > We could make it match the feature id. Or the current index in the table > like you propose. > > Matthias > > On 06/16/2016 08:56 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: Hi, > > I'd like to discuss an issue in the attribute table. > > There is this very first column (not stored in the provider) which > lists > the features as they appear in the provider (by default, if not > re-ordered by the user). What are these values? Some internal ID not > present in the data? Or some internal ID from the qt table widget? > > I am just wondering, because regarding this first column, QGIS behaves > different from Spreadsheets. > > When you reorder the table in QGIS, this very first column becomes "out > of order" - spreadsheets always display 1 to xxx - nicely ordered - > regardless of the sort order. Could QGIS be aligned to the behaviour of > spreadsheets or is there a particular reason not do so? I think, from a > users perspective, because these numbers are not present in the data, > that it would be more useful if they always stay ordered from 1 to xxx > or 0 to xxx, regardless of sorting. > > Thank you for your feedback. > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
