On 20 Jun 2016 8:04 AM, "Paolo Cavallini" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Good to me, thanks Marco. > > > Il 19 giugno 2016 22:36:47 EEST, Marco Bernasocchi <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > >> >> >> >> On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> >>> >>> >>> "official" is better than "community" ? >>> >>> What is the preferred way? >>> >>> "Official" on the contrary sounds a lot like bureocracy to me. >> >> >> >> I think "just" QGIS. The other versions dhould be referred as boundless QGIS, xyz QGIS, etc. >> >> Ciao > > > -- > Paolo Cavallini > www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu> > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] <[email protected]> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Hi guys. Sorry for the stir here. Was not my intention. My request was due to the fact that I was tasked to investigate various support options for both QGIS and PostgreSQL that might be used as part of a future project. My organization is a governmental one and it frowns a bit on the use of OS software and require support contracts in order to manage the project effectively. The other factor is form fit and function of OS over Mac and Windows platforms so that the user has one baseline application with same major and minor version numbers. Thats why I was looking specifically at the Boundless version of QGIS. It was a long shot to assume anyone was in contact with the Boundless guys but I was desperate for an answer. Sorry again for the stirring... Please accept my apology. Regards. Pieter
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
