I'd like to raise an idea for discussion: should we *require* that all 3.0 API breaks are introduced via a PR?
Advantages I'd see are: 1. wider discussion about the nicest way the new/modified API could work 2. allows for discussion about whether the documentation for the API break is sufficient for plugin developers Disadvantages: 1. More work 2. Given that there's going to be a lot of breaks, it could slow development down. I'm a +0 on this. Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
