On 20/07/16 18:17, Even Rouault wrote: >> True... Although we could replace the features in the cache instead of >> dropping the new ones for a tiny improvement. > That would indeed help for the next feature request > >> There might be less complicated examples but this is the one I managed to >> find quickly in my mail box...
Ok, so it's really required... But I think the labelling of the checkbox should somehow better reflect the situation. I think already inverting the question to "Do not send bounding box filter to server" would help to raise awareness. And with a tooltip explaining that this only is used for certain server scenarios it would be enough information for everyone. My thinking now was "Of course I only want only features in the bbox. But wait, why would I even have to opt-in? Is there something wrong with it? Will other features be missing from the attribute table if I put a check there?" Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
