Il 08/08/2016 03:00, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> On 8 August 2016 at 10:36, Chris Crook <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As an alternative to building and maintaining a bunch of translation code, 
>> how feasible would it be to build something like a python project migration 
>> tool?
>>
>> I'm not very familiar with the project XML structure but I'm wondering if it 
>> could be done using a python xml library which could update the appropriate 
>> bits of the project file without needing to handle the full structure (eg 
>> using libxml or something like that).   That would provide some support to 
>> users if their projects were broken by the updates without adding to the 
>> core code base.  (Similar idea to python 2to3 tool, but a lot simpler of 
>> course).  It needn't be perfect - if it handled 95% of cases then that would 
>> still be a great improvement.
> 
> That's a good alternative. The conversion wouldn't actually be that
> complex - it's just a matter of time really.
> 
>>
>> Note that while 2.6 may seem ancient history from a developer point of view, 
>> for users in secured corporate environments it can be difficult to get newer 
>> versions of software approved and installed.  I suspect that running older 
>> versions is more widespread than you might think!
> 
> Sounds like a perfect opportunity for one of these companies to step
> up and sponsor this work...

Hi all,
agreed:
* let's drop compatibility
* make this very clear in release notes
* offer the opportunity to sponsor an external utility (a plugin?) to
convert old project.
Thanks.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to