If you haven't saved the layer after you did the delete the provider still thinks there is 4 features. The layer itself and the edit buffer sit above the data provider.
Generally you should trust the layer as it knows the state of the edit buffer. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a point SHAPE layer with 4 points on a line (just to make them easy > to number in this example, and the layer is created in QGIS). > > > > 1. Start editing. > > 2. Delete point number 3. > > 3. In the python console do the following: > > > > >>> len(list(iface.mapCanvas().currentLayer().getFeatures())) > > 3 > > >>> len(list(iface.mapCanvas().currentLayer().dataProvider(). > getFeatures())) > > 4 > > >>> req = QgsFeatureRequest() > > >>> req = req.setLimit(3) > > >>> len(list(iface.mapCanvas().currentLayer().getFeatures(req))) > > 2 > > >>> len(list(iface.mapCanvas().currentLayer().dataProvider(). > getFeatures(req))) > > 3 > > > > If I access the features using the data provider with no request, I get > too many features back. If I use a request when getting features directly > from the layer, I get too few features back. > > > > I guess the layer directly gives me the best result, but it chokes when > the request is limited. > > > > Who can I trust when getting features during an editing session? Or should > I approach this in another way? > > > > Regards, Casper > > > > Using QGIS master (d3882d5) in Windows 7, x64 > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
