Nice. Glad this is moving forward. Will this facilitate an eventual (not part of your proposal/work) multi-map-frame environment? Alvaro might have good considerations to offer on that front.
On Oct 24, 2016 2:01 PM, "Nathan Woodrow" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice!. This is very welcome. > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Martin Dobias <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Here is my proposal to disrupt the quiet waters of project and map >> layer registry classes: >> >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/76 >> >> I should have time to work on the implementation during December... >> >> Hopefully this will provide a good building block for the rewrite of >> QGIS server for 3.0... >> >> Any feedback to the QEP would be very appreciated! >> >> Cheers >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
