On 10/31/2016 01:26 PM, Patrick Valsecchi wrote: > Matthias, > > Hummm... I don't know about the tabs. Initially I was thinking it would > be a good idea, then I tried to imagine how it would look like for > linked layers within linked layers. We would have two choices: > > * Have QTabWidget within QTabWidget: tabs within tabs is a UX nightmare > * Switch to the current way of representing relations for > sub-relations: that would lead to user confusion because we have two > ways of representing relations. > > What do you think? To me, tabs is not a good idea.
I think the (current) groupbox within groupbox approach suffers from the same UX defficiencies. At least I get confused regularly. Maybe * toplevel tabs * first sublevel groupbox * second sublevel ... groupbox again? skip? button to open in separate window? Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
