Hi I really like the idea of having an osgeo infrastructure that is built on top of an open source stack and gives a user a single login on all infrastructure.
The problem seems to be, that it's just very few people taking care of it and this situation makes it very hard to maintain a good infrastructure. I would really appreciate if UX received more attention also in this context (I actually think it's really important that it does). This discussion fits with my experience so far, it seems to be quite complicated to get up and running with the current system. Personally I would not mind moving to a different provider if it makes maintenance easier and improves UX. Of course, keeping it hard to sign up reduces the amount of reported issues. The question is if it's actually a good filter that reduces noise. I have the feeling that we should rather encourage users to write better reports by providing them with the required information at the time they are writing the bug. See e.g. how we do for QField [1] with a template and a link to the guidelines on top. Thanks for all the good comments in this dicussion! Matthias [1] https://github.com/opengisch/QField/issues/new _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
